Maria and the Golden Dawn

In these past few days we have seen the innocent, and terrified, face of a cute, blonde, little girl plastered over the news as Greek authorities try to figure out who she is. That all efforts should be made to find her family is undeniable, but I can’t help but to find the emphasis on her blondness and the assumptions surrounding her being discovered in a Roma camp in Greece to be deeply disturbing.

That she was found with a family that was not her own, and in the company of adults who haven’t exactly provided a consistent account as to how it was that she came to be with them in the first place, is undeniable. This means that it is possible that she is a victim of child trafficking, but in light of the racist attitudes that have historically tainted the perception of all things Roma (aka gypsy), and the way in which not too long ago children were routinely told that, if they didn’t behave, the gypsies would take them, I am deeply disturbed by the way in which the story is being presented.

The charity currently caring for her said that when she arrived the girl was filthy (something that tends to happen when poverty forces your family to live in squalor), and traumatized (to be expected when a child is torn from everything that is familiar to her, and tossed into a completely alien environment, with no explanation whatsoever). This doesn’t mean she was loved or properly cared for, but at the same time it doesn’t necessarily follow that she wasn’t… and then we have the fact that the story originates in Greece, a country with a resurgent neo-nazi movement embodied by the Golden Dawn.

Considering the fact that in quite a few countries Hitler and his followers killed a higher percentage of the Roma than of the Jewish population (though coming up with an exact figure is much harder), the role of such an ideology should probably be taken into account. Add to that the fact that the gypsies have long been one of Europe’s favorite escape goats (while Greece is a country in the throes of a devastating crisis, where escape goats are desperately needed), and what we have is a rather disturbing picture of the biases that may be fueling this story.

Yes, all efforts should be made to locate this little girl’s family (though the fact that brown-skinned girls attract no such attention is in itself telling), and if she was kidnapped, or if she is a victim of human trafficking, she should be allowed to go home, but at the same time there is something to that old ‘innocent until proven guilty’ thing that seems to have been lost somewhere along the way. This is not unique to this case, a rush to judge is part and parcel of what the media usually does, but even though the evidence seems to be compelling, this is one case in which I wish they would exercise more restraint.

After centuries of discrimination the Roma have no reason to trust the authorities, and they tend to live on the the edges of society, where the proper paperwork is not exactly the norm. This means that the possibility that the adults that were with that little girl when she was found, adults who insist that what we have here is an unofficial adoption, has to be considered (though, unless the girl’s birth mother comes forward to confirm their account, chances are that they will never be able to prove that they are telling the truth either, that’s precisely why it is so important for the legal standard to be ‘innocent until proven guilty’)… and, sensational as the story may be, I wish the media would reserve judgement before fueling the fires of a hatred that has been with us for hundreds of years.

UPDATE: So Maria’s mother has been identified. She is a Roma woman from Bulgaria who has corroborated the story  the adoptive parents have been telling all along, namely that she gave her away because she could not afford to care for her. She insists that no money changed hands, though efforts seem to be under way to charge someone with something… whether anyone is guilty or not. As to the question of what’s in store for Maria, that is unclear. Will the authorities that now hold her fate in their hands acknowledge their mistake, and return her to her own community, or will they place her in what they deem to be a ‘good family’…  with ‘a good family’ being defined as ‘one that is not Roma’?

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Pinterest
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Add to favorites
  • Blogger
  • Email
  • RSS

3 thoughts on “Maria and the Golden Dawn”

  1. They lived in poverty? According to media reports the parents were getting 7,000 euros per month from the Greek government because they had 10 children registered as their own.

    If that is poverty, how do I sign up?

    1. Also why don’t you write about the fact that SYRIZA members were rallying at a courthouse to show solidarity with a pakastani who raped a 14 yr old girl who is now in a coma because of his attack.

      Anything to harm Europeans, eh?

      1. a) Whether the ‘Europeans’ like it or not, the Roma are Europeans.

        b) Never claimed that the adults involved were innocent, what I said was that ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is a principle of law that is being disregarded in this case. That is something the media tends to do, but is especially troubling when considering the impact of centuries of blood libel have had on the Roma.

        In fact this attitude has already given rise to a witch hunt that has caused at least two children to be mistakenly taken from their families in Ireland before being returned when DNA testing proved that, even if they were blond and blue-eyed, they were indeed the biological children of the families they lived with. Of course, with the prevailing attitudes being what they are, those incidents don’t usually make the front pages.

        c) Even if the adults are guilty, and that remains a pretty big *IF*, there is still a disturbingly racist tint to the way the story is being presented. If the adults are guilty they are guilty as individuals, but even though they have been arrested, their names aren’t even mentioned in most stories, just their ethnicity.

        d) Yes, there may well have been some sort of benefits scam going on, as the ‘parents’ had registered an impossibly large number of children over a very short period of time (though the reported figures, both in terms of the number of children and the money involved, vary from source to source). Of course, the question then becomes: where are the pictures of the other kids, where are the attempts to restore them to their own families? If it is not racially motivated, why the double standard?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You can blame the spammers for this one *